<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here We Go Again&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.northwestcyclereport.com/2007/07/24/here-we-go-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.northwestcyclereport.com/2007/07/24/here-we-go-again/</link>
	<description>News and Events for Motorcyclists in Washington, Oregon and Idaho</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.northwestcyclereport.com/2007/07/24/here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-19990</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northwestcyclenews.com/2007/07/24/here-we-go-again/#comment-19990</guid>
		<description>I hate when they use the total number f deaths to show how bad bikes are. That number doesn't mean anything by itself...You have to know if the number of bikes on the road or better yet number of miles ridden has gone up also...If bikeriders rode 8% more miles last year, for example, then a rise of 5.1% in total deaths would actually be an improvement over the year before.

This is why I hate statistics...You can prove either point of view depending how you use the numbers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate when they use the total number f deaths to show how bad bikes are. That number doesn&#8217;t mean anything by itself&#8230;You have to know if the number of bikes on the road or better yet number of miles ridden has gone up also&#8230;If bikeriders rode 8% more miles last year, for example, then a rise of 5.1% in total deaths would actually be an improvement over the year before.</p>
<p>This is why I hate statistics&#8230;You can prove either point of view depending how you use the numbers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.northwestcyclereport.com/2007/07/24/here-we-go-again/comment-page-1/#comment-19985</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.northwestcyclenews.com/2007/07/24/here-we-go-again/#comment-19985</guid>
		<description>And why did the MSF dumb down the BRC a few years ago? No wondeer states are starting their own programs. I guess MSF is just concerned about selling bikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And why did the MSF dumb down the BRC a few years ago? No wondeer states are starting their own programs. I guess MSF is just concerned about selling bikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

